
Trends, examples, and a playbook for which should lead your marketing
Social channels are growing as a primary discovery and conversion path for many businesses, thanks to short-form, shopping features, and infinite scrolling feature that aims to keep you occupied for hours. At the same time, AI-driven SEO is changing the way we look at organic search (more visibility, less guaranteed clicks). Use social when you need fast discovery, creative conversion, and social commerce; lead with AI-SEO when you need durable organic presence, discovery across intent-driven queries, and scale in low-cost long-term traffic.
Why this matters now more than ever
- People spend large amounts of daily time on social platforms; social has matured into a discovery and commerce channel, not just brand awareness.
- At the same time, AI is reshaping search: AI summaries and ranking signals are changing click behavior and required SEO tactics (content depth, structured data, and intent modeling)
So, the key question is, what should be the approach, should a brand opt for social-first strategy or stick to search.
Quick trends – where is the world going
Ten years ago, I would’ve dismissed social as a passing fad, something bound to fade as quickly as it rose. But today, it’s not only still here; it’s growing more powerful with every passing day. Social didn’t fade, but instead became foundational to how people communicate, consume, and create.
- Social discovery & commerce growth: Social commerce penetration is large and growing, social channels are being used to discover and buy products increasingly frequently.
- Social platforms pushing performance tools: Social platforms (Meta, TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Instagram) keep investing in creator tools, commerce, and ads that convert, making social better at lower-funnel actions than it used to be.
- AI changing SEO dynamics: AI-driven tools generate content, predict trends, and create in-search experiences that sometimes reduce clicks even as impressions rise, so the SEO playbook is evolving quickly.
Our learnings from client projects
1) A leading data center in India
The most surprising trend we discovered was while working on a lead generation campaign for a data center in India. We used both Meta ads and Google ads for them, however, the results showed two very interesting marketing signals:
- Large-scale infrastructure + targeted audiences: their audience (enterprises, cloud teams, AI labs, startups) is niche and B2B channels that allow precise audience targeting and content (LinkedIn, Meta B2B placements, niche tech communities) outperformed broad search spend for immediate lead capture and dedicated server/colo bookings.
- Quality and quantity – Although Google Ads has traditionally been the go-to channel for lead generation especially through search campaigns designed to reach users at the moment they’re actively searching, in this case, the scenario played out differently. With CPCs extremely high, Meta Ads using lead forms delivered a larger volume of leads that were also more relevant, all at a significantly lower cost. Meanwhile, PMAX campaigns were generating lead-form leads at a higher cost, and the quality of those leads was noticeably poorer.
Caveat: This could be a trend noticeably visible among other B2B sectors as well.
2) A local HVAC service provider in a small city in USA
Small service businesses often see faster revenue from social than search when they execute creative, local social campaigns:
Client’s story:
- Their organic social media posts related to – before/after installs, short how-to clips, local TikTok/Instagram Reels resulting in instant booking via DMs or native forms. More organic leads came through social media than users searching on Google, primarily because the reach through social media was more targeted compared to waiting for our site to start ranking at the top when someone is searching for the service.
- Result pattern (typical for many HVAC SMBs): Local social posts + paid local awareness campaigns produced immediate booking spikes and a flow of cheaper, higher-intent calls than previous pure Google Ads campaigns. Why? Social content builds trust, shows proof, and converts through frictionless contact (DMs/Bookings), while generic search can be more expensive for immediate local service calls.
Strategic comparison: Social Marketing vs AI-Driven SEO
Core strengths
- Social Marketing
- Fast to test and iterate (creative + offers).
- Excellent for discovery, social proof, and impulse or visually driven purchases.
- Strong targeting (interest, behavior, lookalikes, local).
- Works well for local services, DTC, B2C, and creator/brand-led growth.
- AI-Driven SEO
- Builds durable organic presence and authority for intent-based queries.
- Best for capturing high-intent traffic and long-tail, evergreen queries.
- Scales with domain authority; AI helps automate research, content production, and topic modeling.
Weaknesses / risks
- Social
- Creative fatigue; dependent on platform algorithms which keeps changing. You need to be really innovative and generate reel content to keep the audience engaged.
- Ads cost can rise; performance may need continuous creative refresh.
- Discovery can be shallow leads may need nurturing to convert for high-ticket B2B.
- AI SEO
- Immediate traffic gains can be limited; AI overreliance can produce low-value or nonspecific content and might not be treated worthy of ranking anyways by search engines.
- Search SERP changes (AI snippets, zero-click answers) can reduce clickthroughs even if ranking improves.
When to use what?
- Immediate revenue, local services, product launches, short-cycle sales: Social should lead.
- Lead quality, enterprise sales, high-consideration purchases with long lifecycles: Use social to source & nurture but have SEO lead long-term discovery.
- Brand building + compound organic traffic: SEO (AI-assisted) should be the anchor.
Social or search, what’s working better for you?
If you’re using both social and search platforms as part of your marketing strategy, it’s essential to track performance. Data-driven insights will help you make informed decisions and plan future actions more effectively.
- Social: CPA, Cost per Lead, Lead→Customer conversion rate, engagement rate, video completion, CAC by channel.
- AI-SEO: organic impressions, clicks, click-through rate to pages, conversions from organic, rankings for intent keywords, impressions in AI/featured snippets. (Watch “impressions up but clicks down” patterns.)
Which should lead your strategy? A decision framework
- Map business model & funnel
- Fast, short sales cycle, local or visual product → Social lead.
- High ARPU, long sales cycle, search-first intent → SEO lead (with social supporting nurturing and creator advocacy).
- Audience behavior
- Younger, social-native audiences (TikTok/Instagram) → Social emphasis.
- Research-driven, intentful audiences (enterprise buyers, technical searches) → SEO emphasis.
- Competitive landscape & cost
- If search CPCs are high and you can use targeted social to reach decision-makers cheaper, bias to social.
- If your category has low competition in long-tail organic queries, invest in AI-SEO for durable wins.
- Time horizon
- Need results in weeks → Social should carry >50% of short-term budget.
- Building 6–24 months of evergreen growth → SEO needs sustained investment.
Use social for speed and audience engagement only because the moment you stop posting content, your reach will reduce, you will stop showing up in feeds and out of sight would be out of mind. AI-driven SEO should be considered for building long-term discovery. If you are at the top of the search ladder, there is a high chance you will continue to stay at the top even if you stop generating new content.